(A) the class members’ interests in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions The matters pertinent to these findings include: (3) the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. (2) the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class, so that final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate respecting the class as a whole or (B) adjudications with respect to individual class members that, as a practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other members not parties to the individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests (A) inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing the class or (1) prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of: A class action may be maintained if Rule 23(a) is satisfied and if: (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class and (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all members only if:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |